athically to the desires and needs of Jewish laity. From the comments of many colleagues it is apparent that Reform and Reconstructionist rabbis are increasingly seeking creative ways to be affirming and supportive of couples at the time of their ceremony. This may also explain why more and more rabbis are now willing to officiate with non-Jewish clergy, in spite of strong rabbinic pressure to declare this kind of ceremony out of bounds.
1Because of the comparatively small number of RRA members and the possibility of sampling error, care should be taken in drawing inferences from these numbers both here and in the data that follow.
2The total number of respondents, as well as the total number for each category, differs from the sum of CCAR and RRA respondents because four respondents belong to both organizations.
Summary of Rabbinic Center for Research and Counseling 1995 Survey
December
29, 1995 Irwin H. Fishbein, Rabbi, D. Min.
This
survey has a threefold purpose: 1)
to determine the present position of the Reform and Reconstructionist
rabbinate on officiating at intermarriages, 2) to compare data with
previous Rabbinic Center surveys and 3) to update the list of rabbis who
officiate at intermarriages. A
questionnaire with four levels of participation and non_participation in
intermarriage ceremonies and eighteen conditions of officiating was sent
by first class mail to 1794 rabbinic members of the Central Conference
of American Rabbis (CCAR) and of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical
Association (RRA). Of this number, 1651 are members of the CCAR and 167 are
members of the RRA. Twenty-four
rabbis belong to both organizations.
Of
the 710 respondents, representing a 40% response rate, 334 or 47%
officiate at intermarriages under specified conditions, 274 or 39% do
not officiate but are willing to refer to rabbis who do, and 102 or 14%
neither officiate nor refer. A
comparison of CCAR and RRA respondents indicates that CCAR members
officiate more frequently (48% compared to 38%) but that, when
categories of officiation and referral are combined, 89% of RRA
members refer compared with 86% of CCAR members (see Table 1).
TABLE
1
|
COMPARISON OF CCAR AND RRA
RESPONDENTS 1995 |
||||||
|
POSITION |
CCAR |
RRA |
CCAR/RRA TOTAL |
|||
|
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
|
|
OFFICIATE |
318 |
48 |
24 |
38 |
334 |
47 |
|
REFER |
245 |
37 |
32 |
51 |
274 |
39 |
|
DO NOT REFER |
96 |
15 |
7 |
11 |
102 |
14 |
|
TOTAL RESPONDENTS |
659 |
100 |
63 |
100 |
710[1] |
100 |
Of
the 334 rabbis who officiate, 231 or 69% were willing to have their
names on the list of C.C.A.R. and R.R.A. Rabbis Who Officiate at
Intermarriages, while 103 or 31% requested that their names not be
on the list. The list
contained 220 rabbis in 1990, 202 in 1986, 178 in 1982, 159 in 1978, 119
in 1973, 78 in 1971 and 61 in 1969.
Since 1969 the number of rabbis on the list has more than
quadrupled, while the number of Reform and Reconstructionist rabbis has not quite doubled (see Table 2).
TABLE
2
|
RESPONDENTS WHO OFFICIATE AT
INTERMARRIAGES 1982-1995
|
||||||||||||
|
POSITION |
1982 |
1986 |
1990 |
1995 |
1995 |
1995 |
||||||
|
CCAR |
CCAR |
CCAR/RRA |
CCAR |
RRA |
CCAR/RRA |
|||||||
|
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
|
|
LIST |
178 |
61 |
202 |
73 |
220 |
62 |
221 |
69 |
17 |
71 |
231 |
69 |
|
NON-LIST |
115 |
39 |
76 |
27 |
135 |
38 |
97 |
31 |
7 |
29 |
103 |
31 |
|
TOTAL OFFICIANTS |
293 |
100 |
278 |
100 |
355 |
100 |
318 |
100 |
24 |
100 |
3341 |
100 |
Of
the 710 respondents, 334 or 47% officiate, compared to 44% in 1990 and 50%
in 1986 and 1982; 274 or 39% refer, compared to 38% in 1990, 32% in 1986
and 31% in 1982; and 96 or 14% do not refer, compared to 18% in 1990 and
1986 and 19% in 1982. The
historical data show that a small but a steady increase in the percentage
of rabbis who are willing to refer to other rabbis and a corresponding
decrease in the percentage of rabbis who do not refer (see Table 3).
TABLE
3
|
COMPARISON
OF CCAR AND RRA RESPONDENTS 1982-1995 |
||||||||||||
|
POSITION |
1982 |
1986 |
1990 |
1995 |
||||||||
|
CCAR |
CCAR |
CCAR |
RRA |
CCAR/RRA |
CCAR/RRA |
|||||||
|
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
|
|
OFFICIATE |
293 |
50 |
278 |
50 |
335 |
46 |
23 |
34 |
355 |
44 |
334 |
47 |
|
REFER |
180 |
31 |
174 |
32 |
265 |
36 |
34 |
52 |
302 |
38 |
274 |
39 |
|
DO
NOT REFER |
109 |
19 |
100 |
18 |
129 |
18 |
8 |
13 |
141 |
18 |
102 |
14 |
|
TOTAL
RESPONDENTS |
582 |
100 |
552 |
100 |
729 |
100 |
65 |
99 |
798 |
100 |
710 |
100 |
Compared
to the 1990 survey, there has been a 4% decrease in respondents who
participate with non_Jewish clergy and a very slight decrease of 1% in
those who officiate in churches where Christian symbols are visible.
However, two categories have changed significantly.
C.C.A.R. respondents who require a commitment to establish a Jewish
home and/or raise children as Jews have decreased from 64% in 1990 to 42%
in the current survey and those who require the rabbi to be the only
officiant have decreased from 62% to 43%.
The present survey indicates that, while the percentages in these
two categories have declined for Reconstructionist rabbis, the decline has
been much more gradual than for Reform rabbis.
Reconstructionist rabbis continue to maintain a more traditional
stance than their Reform colleagues with respect to these two conditions
(see Table 4).
TABLE
4
|
CONDITIONS
OF OFFICIATING 1982-1995 |
||||||||||
|
SELECTED
CONDITIONS |
1982 |
1986 |
1990 |
1995 |
||||||
|
CCAR |
CCAR |
CCAR |
RRA | |||||||